This review analyzes lip-reading technologies' datasets and model architectures, revealing performance gaps across languages.
This paper aims to systematically review deep learning–driven lip-reading technologies, covering benchmark datasets, advances in model architecture, and cross-linguistic performance. Distinguished from existing surveys that predominantly enumerate methodologies in chronological sequence, this work consolidates the most extensive collection of 79 lip-reading datasets reported to date and establishes a problem-driven analytical framework to delineate the technological evolution from shallow feature extraction to global temporal modeling. Systematic analysis of the state of the art reveals a pronounced cross-linguistic performance disparity: state-of-the-art visual-only models attain 94.1% accuracy on standard English benchmarks, yet only 57.1% accuracy on Chinese benchmarks, representing a substantial performance gap of 37 percentage points rooted in intrinsic linguistic properties. This review identifies critical challenges and outlines promising research directions in lip-reading, therefore offering structured guidance for the continued development of multilingual visual speech recognition systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: