Study evaluated the effect of Co and Ru promoters on hydrogen yield in ethanol steam reforming, suggesting enhanced efficiency with minimal carbon deposits.
Bioethanol is an attractive renewable feedstock for sustainable H 2 production because of its high hydrogen content and ease handling. Among thermochemical routes, ethanol steam reforming (ESR) offers the highest theoretical H 2 yield, yet catalyst deactivation by carbon deposition limits its application. Here, 10 wt% Ni/CeO 2 catalysts promoted with trace amounts of Co or Ru (0.25 wt%) were evaluated for ESR. Both promoters enhanced hydrogen production and reduced coke formation compared with unpromoted Ni/CeO 2 . NH 3 desorption revealed a lower density of acidic sites, consistent with inhibition of ethanol dehydration and coke-forming pathways. In situ DRIFTS revealed that promoters decreased methane formation while favored carbonate and acetate species. Notably, 10Ni/0.25Ru/CeO 2 delivered the highest hydrogen yield and the lowest carbon formation rate (22 mg carbon g cat −1 h −1 ), with only 9 wt% carbon deposition in 6 h of continuous operation, highlighting ultra-low promoter loadings as an efficient and cost-effective strategy for ESR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Augusto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: