Investigates geocell's effect on foundation stability, suggesting enhanced performance.
Optimizing the structural stability of foundations is challenging in modern geotechnical engineering. This study investigated the mechanism of geocell-reinforced foundations through discrete element modeling based on transparent soil model tests. A three-dimensional particle flow code (PFC3D) model was developed to investigate the micromechanical soil–geocell interactions in both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced foundations under strip loading. Particle displacement, contact force distribution, and structural deformation within the foundation system were analyzed to quantify the performance of geocell reinforcement. The results show that geocell inclusion enhances structural performance by 2.1 times compared to an unreinforced foundation, increasing the bearing capacity from 60.6 to 126.8 kPa at a defined bearing capacity criterion. The geocell walls act as rigid physical boundaries that microscopically intercept the lateral migration and horizontal extrusion of soil particles. The kinematic trajectories of soil particles beneath the loading plate are forced into a downward realignment, decreasing the displacement vector rotation angle from 42° in the unreinforced soil to 27° in the reinforced soil and effectively mitigating the heave of adjacent surfaces. Furthermore, the quasi-rigid three-dimensional network completely interrupts the continuous steep contact force chains inherent in unreinforced foundations. Concentrated vertical stresses are converted into horizontal components through interfacial friction and mechanical interlocking, resulting in the lateral redistribution of the applied load by a distance of approximately 0.06 m. The geocell–soil composite considered as a flexible raft foundation extends load dispersion and reduces average subsoil pressure. A coupled tension and compression stress state in the horizontal plane is developed within the geocell structure. Forces are channeled along rigid paths by elevated bending moments and stress concentrations at the cell junctions. These findings provide micromechanical insights into the performance of geocell-reinforced-foundation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: