Retrospective cohort study evaluates IOP control in glaucoma patients after Baerveldt surgery, highlighting age as a risk factor.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgery performed as a primary filtering procedure in eyes without prior glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 148 eyes of 148 patients who underwent BGI surgery with a 350-mm2 endplate at a single tertiary center. Surgical success was defined using three intraocular pressure (IOP)-based criteria: IOP > 21 mmHg (criterion A), >17 mmHg (criterion B), or >14 mmHg (criterion C), failure to achieve ≥ 20% IOP reduction, need for additional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception, or persistent hypotony. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate surgical outcomes and prognostic factors. Results: The 5-year cumulative probability of surgical success was 70.6%, 49.8%, and 27.6% for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. Mean IOP decreased significantly from 33.5 ± 10.0 mmHg preoperatively to 13.9 ± 4.0 mmHg at 5 years (p < 0.01); number of glaucoma medications decreased from 4.0 ± 1.2 to 1.8 ± 1.9 (p < 0.01). Younger age was associated with a higher risk of surgical failure (criterion A: hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, p < 0.01; criterion B: HR 0.98, p = 0.011; criterion C: HR 0.97, p < 0.01). More previous intraocular surgeries were associated with failure under criterion B (HR 1.30, p = 0.048). Early and late postoperative complications occurred in 34.5% and 14.2% of eyes, respectively; 20.9% required additional postoperative interventions. Conclusions: BGI surgery performed as a primary filtering procedure demonstrated favorable long-term IOP control in eyes without prior glaucoma filtering surgery. Younger age was identified as a consistent risk factor for surgical failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwasaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: