Assesses mechanical performance and environmental impacts of sewage sludge-modified cemented clay, indicating improved eco-efficiency.
This study assesses the mechanical performance, freeze-thaw durability, and cradle-to-gate environmental impacts of cement-stabilised clay where cement is partially replaced with fresh sewage sludge (SS). Mixes included 5 %, 7 %, and 10 % cement (by dry soil) and SS replacement levels of 0 %, 3 %, 5 %, 7 %, and 10 % (by cement mass). Specimens were compacted to dry densities of 1.50 and 1.70 g/cm 3 , cured for 28 days, and tested for 28-day unconfined compressive strength (UCS). Freeze-thaw resistance was measured using accumulated mass loss (ALM) and observed failure behaviour. The environmental assessment employed openLCA with ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) for a functional unit of 1 m 3 of stabilised clay at the target density. UCS increased with cement content and dry density. SS replacement resulted in a non-monotonic strength response, typically peaking at 3–5 %, indicating improved cement-efficiency at low replacement levels. Under the tested conditions, UCS increased from 2,421 kPa (C10-SS0, 1.50 g/cm 3 ) to 3,814.5 kPa at SS3 in the same series. The freeze-and-thaw performance also improved significantly in the C5 series at 1.70 g/cm 3 . The control sample failed at Cycle 5 (ALM = 77.74 %), but SS3 remained intact through Cycle 12. ReCiPe midpoint impacts increased with cement content and density but decreased consistently as SS increased, resulting in 7–8 % reductions compared to controls. Strength-normalised impacts showed the greatest eco-efficiency gains at SS3-SS5, maximising environmental benefits per unit of performance. Durability-coupled indices further favoured mixtures achieving both lower impacts and reduced ALM, highlighting the importance of jointly optimising strength, durability, and environmental performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haroon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: