Qualitative research explores the social and workplace experiences of cancer survivors, indicating essential needs for support and policy improvements.
Introduction: As global cancer incidence and survival rates continue to rise, understanding the experiences and needs of individuals in the survivorship phase is critical to inform policies that promote equitable care and adequate support for cancer survivors. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the lived social and workplace experiences of cancer survivors in Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada) using a qualitative research design. Methods: The study was open to cancer survivors of majority age who resided in Newfoundland and Labrador after their diagnosis. Between June 2023 and August 2024, twenty-five individuals participated in the study. Data were collected virtually through focus groups, individual interviews, or written responses. Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants were collected via a survey. Thematic analysis was performed on all qualitative data. Two patient partner investigators informed the research throughout the entire project. Results: Data were rich and diverse, revealing a range of positive and negative experiences in social and workplace settings. Major themes included stigma in social and workplace environments, financial toxicity, workplace accommodations, social support and information needs. Young participants had unique challenges. Participants offered recommendations aimed at enhancing available supports and improving the quality of life of cancer survivors. Overall, findings highlight shared experiences across different regions and cultures while also painting the local context. Discussion: The results of this study reveal diverse experiences among cancer survivors within social and workplace settings. The findings and resulting recommendations can inform meaningful improvement to policies and programs, thus promoting equity and enhancing the lived experiences of cancer survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: