A Hybrid AHP–TOPSIS–SBSC Framework for Sustainable Soil Protection in Surface Coal Mining

Soil vulnerability is commonly assessed using environmental indicators; however, the lack of systematic and continuous monitoring often leads to incomplete and fragmented data, particularly in surface coal mining areas affected by potentially toxic element (PTE) contamination. Existing studies mainly focus on impact assessment, with limited emphasis on structured decision-support frameworks for selecting optimal soil protection strategies. This study addresses this gap by proposing an integrated hybrid decision-making framework that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC), and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The main contribution lies in integrating strategic sustainability perspectives (SBSC) with quantitative multi-criteria methods (AHP and TOPSIS), enabling a transparent and consistent evaluation of soil protection strategies across environmental, economic, technical, and social dimensions. The framework was applied to the Kostolac mining and energy complex in Serbia as a representative case study, using data from the State of the Environment Report as the basis for expert evaluation. The results identify risk reduction and environmental effectiveness as the dominant criteria, while the Progressive Strategy (SBSC) achieved the highest ranking. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model. From a policy perspective, the findings support prioritizing sustainability-oriented and risk-reduction strategies in mining regulations and investment planning.