Randomized trial evaluates treatments for preventing intra-abdominal adhesions in rats, highlighting PBMT’s effectiveness.
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), therapeutic ultrasound (TUS), boric acid (BA), and their combinations in preventing experimentally induced intra‐abdominal adhesions in rats. Materials and Methods Ninety‐six male Wistar rats (14 weeks old) were randomly assigned to eight groups (Control, Laparotomy, Physiological Saline, BA, PBMT, TUS, BA + PBMT, and BA + TUS; n = 12/group). Adhesions were surgically induced. Treatments were applied once daily for 7 consecutive days as follows: BA (8 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), PBMT (904 nm, 3 J/cm 2 applied to the incision site), and TUS (1 MHz, 0.5 W/cm 2 applied to the incision site). On Day 8, rats were euthanized, and peritoneal fluid and adhesion tissue samples were collected for macroscopic scoring, histopathology, biochemical assays, and gene expression analyses. Results PBMT alone significantly reduced adhesion scores compared with the control ( p < 0.05) and showed the most pronounced antifibrotic effect, while BA and TUS, alone or in combination, had limited impact. BA treatment increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels ( p < 0.05), indicating higher oxidative stress, whereas PBMT enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) ( p < 0.05). Gene expression analysis revealed that PBMT modulated cytokines linked to inflammation, particularly tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1). Conclusion PBMT demonstrated significant potential in reducing intra‐abdominal adhesions by alleviating inflammation, controlling oxidative stress, and promoting tissue repair. BA and TUS showed limited efficacy under the present experimental conditions, and BA in particular was associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. Further research with optimized dosing, extended treatment durations, and combination strategies is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: