Experimental investigation reveals critical factors for coalescence in dust suppression applications, indicating potential efficiencies.
Collisions between droplets and solid particles may result in rebounding, coalescence, or droplet rupture. In spray-based dust suppression, coalescence is the most desirable outcome because it promotes particle mass increase and gravitational settling. Therefore, identifying the governing factors and critical conditions for coalescence is essential for improving spray dust mitigation efficiency. Although previous studies have made significant progress in establishing transition criteria between rebounding and coalescence, quantitative predictive models distinguishing coalescence from rupture remain limited, particularly for suspended particle–droplet interactions at the micro-scale. In this study, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model employing a dynamic mesh technique and the coupled level-set/volume of fluid (VOF) method is used to investigate the collision dynamics between suspended particles and droplets. The results demonstrate that the collision outcome is jointly governed by the solid–liquid density ratio, contact angle, relative impact velocity, particle-to-droplet size ratio, droplet viscosity, and surface tension. Based on momentum and energy conservation principles, a predictive criterion model for the transition between coalescence and rupture is proposed, revealing the underlying dynamic mechanisms controlling collision behavior. Based on the proposed model, the influence of key parameters on the coalescence regime is quantified, providing guidance for optimizing spray operating parameters and additive formulations. The present findings not only promote the development of spray dust suppression technology but also provide theoretical support for related fields, including particle surface modification, fire smoke scrubbing, and pharmaceutical engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: