Dataset tracks effort-based reward valuation in individuals, indicating varying responses according to effort levels.
Dataset related to the paper entitled “Tracking the Temporal Dynamics of Post-Effort Reward Valuation: The Role of Individual Differences in Physical Effort Valuation”. This dataset includes: 1) Effort-Doors task (PsychoPy script)“EffortDoors_PsychoPy_Task.zip” contains the PsychoPy script and the images used in the Effort-Doors task. 2) Scalp topography plots “RewP Gain minus Loss for Low Effort.tif”: scalp topography of the ΔRewP in the low-effort condition. “RewP Gain minus Loss for High Effort.tif”: scalp topography of the ΔRewP in the high-effort condition. “RewP Gain minus Loss.tif”: scalp topography of the ΔRewP collapsed across effort conditions. 3) R script for data management and analysis “Effort_Reward_Final.R” contains the code used for the analysis of EEG outcomes and self-reported data. “Effort_Reward_Behavioural_Execution_Press_rate.R” contains the code used for processing the Effort-Doors behavioural data and conducting the supplementary trial-wise behavioural check based on execution press rate. 4) EEG data, self-reported and behavioural data “Mean_Amplitudes_with_Odd_Evens_and_Data_for_ERP_Plots.xlsx” includes two subtables: Table 1 contains mean ERP amplitudes for each participant across electrodes and experimental conditions (Gain/Loss × HE/LE × Odds/Evens). Table 2 contains time-resolved ERP data across conditions, used for waveform plotting. “RewP_Data.xlsx” includes two subtables: Table 1 contains ERP data and self-reported data. Table 2 provides explanations for abbreviated names of some self-reported variables “Effort_Reward_behavioural_raw_data.csv” contains the raw behavioural data from the Effort-Doors task. These data were used for the supplementary trial-wise behavioural check examining whether the high-effort versus low-effort distinction was behaviourally expressed and whether this distinction changed across trial progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: