Narrative review evaluates 3D bioprinted scaffolds for tissue regeneration, suggesting promising advancements over traditional methods.
Periodontal disease remains one of the leading causes of tooth loss worldwide, highlighting the need for effective regeneration of alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, and cementum. The structural complexity and unique biological behavior of these tissues have historically posed significant challenges for clinical regeneration strategies. The primary therapeutic approach used is guided bone regeneration; however, it has certain limitations, such as morbidity, low structural integrity and dimensional stability. Recent advances in 3-dimensional (3D) bioprinting have made it possible to fabricate customized scaffolds with precise architecture and spatial organization that closely mimic normal periodontal structures. The incorporation of multifunctional nanocomposite biomaterials and nanoparticles further enhances the performance of the scaffolds by increasing mechanical strength, bioactivity and controlling degradation rates. These advanced scaffolds function as dynamic microenvironments that support cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, ultimately promoting tissue regeneration. Furthermore, their multifunctional properties allow for the controlled release of growth factors, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agents, as well as the incorporation of stem cells and bioactive molecules that facilitate angiogenesis. This review investigates and critically evaluates modern approaches for the regeneration of periodontal tissues through scaffolds, biomaterials and 3D bioprinting technologies, as well as to assess their effectiveness compared to established clinical practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsantiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: