Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review examines immune evasion in colorectal cancer and proposes new treatment strategies.
Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) presents a striking dichotomy. MSS/pMMR tumors account for approximately 95% of metastatic CRC cases, representing a substantial global health burden. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic CRC—achieving durable responses in tumors with high mutational burden and a T-cell-inflamed microenvironment—the majority of microsatellite stable (MSS) cases remain resistant. The MSS tumor microenvironment is typically “cold”, featuring low neoantigen load, poor T-cell infiltration, and dominant immunosuppressive networks. To overcome this resistance, extensive research is focused on combination strategies (ICIs with anti-angiogenic agents, targeted therapies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) and next-generation modalities (adoptive cell therapies, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccines). This review examines the biological basis for this dichotomy, summarizes clinical evidence in dMMR/MSI-H CRC, and critically assesses emerging strategies for MSS disease. We propose that future progress will likely depend on mechanism-based, biomarker-driven approaches that match specific immune evasion patterns with rationally designed interventions, with the goal of extending immunotherapy benefits to broader CRC populations. This narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and clinical trial registries (2015– 2025), prioritizing Phase II/III trials and mechanistic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: