Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey analyzes significant studies on image steganalysis, highlighting gaps and proposing a unified taxonomy.
This survey presents an overview of the development of image steganalysis from basic statistical models to the latest deep learning architectures. A total of 24 significant studies were analyzed, which are grouped into six important dimensions: embedding domain coverage, dataset diversity, low-payload sensitivity, adversarial robustness, pixel-level defense evaluation, computational efficiency. It also shows that the literature is fragmented, with no existing model that effectively covers the cases of heterogeneous dual-domain detection, realistic adversarial robustness on pixel level, and lightweight deployment. Three main gaps were identified: cover-source mismatch in the case of homogeneous training data, single domain architectural limitations, feature space adversarial evaluation that does not represent actual threat models; a unified taxonomy for future research is proposed. This survey provides a well-founded base for quantifying dataset heterogeneity from an information theoretic perspective, providing a principled ground for assessing generalisability in steganalysis systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asmau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: