Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study demonstrates the interactions of Co(II) and Fe(II) complexes with lactate and fluoride, indicating their potential as MRI probes.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Three pentadentate ligands based on 1,4,7-triazacyclononane (TACN) bearing 6-methyl-2-picolyl pendants and ancillary groups alkyl-sulfonate (L1), benzyl (L2), or proton (L3) were prepared to generate Fe(II) and Co(II) complexes as paramagnetic shift (parashift) agents with available coordination sites for anion binding. The solid-state structure of [Co(L2)(NO 3 )](NO 3 ) confirms a six-coordinate complex cation with distorted octahedral geometry. 17 O NMR spectroscopy studies support rapidly exchanging inner-sphere water for [Co(L1)] +, [Co(L2)] 2+, and [Co(L3)] 2+ at neutral pH and for [Fe(L1)] + and [Fe(L2)] 2+ under mildly acidic conditions. The methyl proton resonances of [Co(L1)] + and [Co(L2)] 2+ appear at −45 ppm and +40 ppm and those of [Co(L3)] 2+ appear at −51 ppm and +21 ppm, compared to those of the symmetrical complex [Co(L4)] 2+ at 8 ppm. [Fe(L1)] + and [Fe(L2)] 2+ have methyl proton resonances at −38 or −39 ppm, which compare to that of [Fe(L4)] 2+ at 21 ppm. 1 H and 19 F NMR spectroscopy studies suggest fluoride binds as an inner-sphere ligand to Fe(II) complexes and to [Co(L1)] + and [Co(L2)] 2+ . Co(II) and Fe(II) complexes with bound water show second-sphere interactions with trifluorolactate and fluoride as supported by NMR studies. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging at 7 T demonstrates strong, well-resolved methyl signals for [Co(L1)] + and [Co(L2)] 2+, highlighting their potential as parashift probes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: