Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates renewable electrocoagulation's impact on treatment efficiency in wastewater management, suggesting environmental benefits.
Electrocoagulation (EC) offers a compact and controllable option for decentralized laundry wastewater treatment, but its practical deployment is constrained by electricity cost, carbon intensity, and variable wastewater generation. This study develops a renewable-powered modular EC framework integrating photovoltaic generation, battery storage, grid backup, hydraulic equalization, and parallel EC modules through an energy-scheduling layer. A 1.0 m³ day −1 design case was evaluated under fixed-grid operation, renewable-scheduled operation, and low-renewable emergency operation. The scheduling strategy coordinated current density, active module number, flow allocation, battery state of charge, and effluent-quality constraints while preserving hydraulic retention time. Under renewable-scheduled operation, removal efficiencies reached 83.9% for COD, 92.8% for turbidity, 90.1% for TSS, 80.7% for MBAS, 86.9% for oil and grease, and 82.1% for phosphate. Compared with fixed-grid operation, renewable scheduling increased the renewable fraction to 76.4%, reduced grid import by 62.8%, decreased peak-hour grid use by 79.5%, and lowered greenhouse-gas intensity from 0.680 to 0.218 kg CO₂e m −3 . Unit OPEX decreased from 0.336 to 0.281 USD m −3 . The results demonstrate that modular EC can function as a dispatchable electrochemical treatment load for low-carbon decentralized wastewater management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: