What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to extract and analyze key metrics from preregistered scoping reviews to support research planning and improve methodological quality.

June 17, 2026Research Synthesis MethodsOpen Access

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This study aims to extract and analyze key metrics from preregistered scoping reviews to support research planning and improve methodological quality.
Examined 2,038 scoping review protocol registrations on the Open Science Framework from April to August 2024
Identified and analyzed 891 corresponding publications
Utilized Stata for calculating metrics such as review duration, yield rate, and qualitative aspects like aims and eligibility criteria.
91.47% of identified publications were published as scoping reviews
Average review duration was 80.41 weeks, with rapid reviews taking an average of 55.63 weeks
5.68% yield rate with an average of 6,920.66 potential inclusions and 92.64 studies ultimately included.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Meta-research analyzes key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews to enhance planning and methodological rigor.

Cite This Study

Nordmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323c94d50b63ecad206b3d https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2026.10078

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider