Evaluates pancreatin effects on growth and meat quality in broilers fed high Chlorella vulgaris, suggesting improved outcomes.
This study evaluated whether pancreatin super-dosage or extrusion could mitigate the negative effects of high dietary inclusion of Chlorella vulgaris (20%), on broiler growth performance. It assessed changes in meat traits and preliminary health-related indicators.2. A total of 120, 7-d old broilers were allocated into one of four treatments; a control diet, or supplemented with either 20% untreated C. vulgaris, 20% C. vulgaris plus 0.30% pancreatin or 20% extruded C. vulgaris. Growth performance was monitored weekly from d 7 to 35 of age, with post-slaughter evaluations focusing on meat traits and organ metrics. Excreta quality and beak adhesion scores were recorded weekly.3. The results indicated that 20% C. vulgaris inclusion impaired growth performance and pancreatin supplementation restored final body weight to levels comparable to those of controls by d 35 of age (p < 0.001). Extrusion affected feed conversion ratio (FCR; p < 0.001). The Chlorella. vulgaris diets improved breast muscle yield and carcass yields increased when treatments were applied (p < 0.001 and p = 0.010, respectively).4. Meat fatty acid profile was improved which was characterised by a reduced n-6/n-3 ratio (p < 0.001), alongside enhanced antioxidant capacity (p = 0.030) and increased yellowness (p < 0.001). No adverse effects were observed in health-related indicators, including excreta quality, digesta viscosity and organ measurements (p > 0.05), although feed adhesion to the beak was increased in all C. vulgaris diets, particularly the extruded form (p < 0.001).5. In conclusion, incorporating 20% C. vulgaris into broiler diets was feasible when combined with enzyme super-dosage, allowing recovery of final body weight and improving meat quality without compromising animal health. However, extrusion at this inclusion level impaired feed efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: