Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates LGD impact on sheep predation by foxes in Patagonia, suggesting enhanced livestock safety.
Livestock predation by carnivores drives global human-carnivore conflict. Non-lethal strategies like Livestock Guardian Dogs (LGDs) prove effective, yet their interactions with biophysical factors (e.g., habitats) and ecological variables (e.g., carnivore/prey abundance) remain poorly understood. This study evaluated whether LGD presence reduces sheep predation by Lycalopex foxes and how LGDs interact with biophysical/ecological variables shaping predation risk patterns, using Chilean Patagonia ranches as a model system. Using 2017–2018 predation data, we identified key landscape and species variables influencing risk (vegetation composition, nearest distance to road/farmstead, fox/hare abundance, LGD presence) via logistic regression on kill and random points from five ranches (two with LGDs, three without). We analyzed 94 fresh sheep carcasses killed by foxes: 26 in LGD ranches (0.77 sheep/ha) vs. 68 without LGDs (1.34 sheep/ha). Fox predation was lower with LGDs (χ 2 = 4.90, p = 0.026). Models showed negative shrubland cover association and LGD × bareland × hare abundance interactions. With LGDs, risk declined with bareland and hare abundance; without LGDs, risk was unrelated to bareland but increased sharply with hare abundance. Mean predation probability was 0.26 (± 0.001), peaking at 0.39 (± 0.07) without LGDs. By mitigating risk factors, LGDs enhance landscape safety for livestock, reduce economic losses and lethal mesocarnivores control, supporting carnivore conservation in livestock-dominated landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusti‐Muñoz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: