Randomized trial evaluates surface roughness changes in resin materials after toothbrushing with various dentifrices, indicating material-dentifrice compatibility matters.
This study aimed to evaluate changes in surface roughness after simulated toothbrushing in conventional and additively manufactured resin-based restorative materials using different dentifrices. Four conventional resin composites (flowable, ormocer-based, supra-nano-filled, and bulk-fill) and two additively manufactured restorative resins were included. Specimens were subjected to five brushing conditions: distilled water (control), fluoridated, bioactive, probiotic, and whitening dentifrices (n = 10). Toothbrushing was performed for 5,000 cycles under a 200-g load. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured before and after brushing using a contact profilometer, and surface morphology was qualitatively assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc tests (α = 0.05). No significant main effect of restorative material (p = 0.540) or dentifrice type (p = 0.645) was observed; however, a significant material-dentifrice interaction was detected (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed material-dependent differences in roughness change following brushing. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, post-brushing surface roughness was influenced by the specific combination of restorative material and dentifrice. These findings may be relevant when selecting restorative materials and dentifrices for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbıyık et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: