Reveals sandstone's mechanical response to high temperatures, highlighting safety in underground gasification processes.
The extreme thermal environment during the underground coal gasification (UCG) process poses a severe threat to the stability of the gasification cavity and the integrity of the surrounding rock. This paper aims to reveal the thermo-mechanical response characteristics and damage evolution mechanism of sandstone under true triaxial unloading conditions following exposure to high temperatures. Sandstone specimens were thermally pre-treated at five temperature gradients (25 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C) and subsequently subjected to true triaxial loading and unloading experiments. The effects of varying temperatures on the strength, deformation parameters, dilation angle evolution, and macroscopic failure modes of the sandstone were systematically analyzed. The results indicate a significant critical transition point in the mechanical behavior of the sandstone at 400 °C. Below this threshold, thermal-induced microcrack closure leads to an increase in peak strength (with the peak strength at 800 °C increasing by approximately 67% compared to room temperature). Conversely, above 400 °C, thermal damage to the mineral grains intensifies, causing the crack propagation pattern to transition from brittle shear to a complex tension-shear splitting mode, accompanied by severe dilatancy (with a generalized Poisson’s ratio exceeding 0.8). Based on these findings, this study proposes a stage-wise damage evolution model alongside a targeted zonal support strategy, recommending the application of high-prestressed support in high-temperature zones above 400 °C to suppress tensile failure. Ultimately, this research provides a crucial theoretical basis for evaluating the long-term stability of high-temperature underground engineering projects and ensuring operational safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: