Randomized trial compares reactive balance control outcomes in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury, suggesting no added benefits from FES.
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) have difficulty eliciting reactive steps when balance is lost, increasing fall risk. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the common fibular nerve elicits a flexor withdrawal response, potentially assisting reactive stepping. Combining reactive balance training with FES (Reactive Balance Training [RBT] + FES) may enhance reactive balance control. This study compared the efficacy of RBT + FES to RBT alone in individuals with chronic, motor iSCI. METHODS: Twenty-two individuals (63.9 ± 14.8 years; 3.8 ± 2.8 years post-injury) were randomly assigned to RBT + FES or RBT alone. They completed 18 1-hour training sessions over 6 weeks. Outcome measures were assessed pre-, immediately post- and 6 months post-intervention, and included the behavioural response of the Lean-and-Release test (single-step, 2-step, ≥3-step, or fall) and clinical measures of balance, balance confidence, fall concern, lower limb strength, and proprioception of the ankle. A 2-way mixed analysis of variance assessed group differences over time. Fall incidence was monitored via an online survey for 6 months following training. RESULTS: ≤ .01) with the exception of ankle proprioception. No significant group or group × time interactions were found, suggesting similar improvements between groups. There were no significant between-group differences in fall tracking data. DISCUSSION: Both RBT + FES and RBT alone led to significant improvements in reactive stepping ability, balance control, balance confidence, fall concern, and lower limb strength. However, the FES protocol applied in this study did not provide additional benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heffernan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: