Reference manual details an open-source Python framework for cetacean vocalization detection in passive acoustic monitoring.
This document is the reference manual for ai-pam-pipeline (v1.0.0), an open-source Python framework for CNN-based detection and classification of cetacean vocalizations in passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) recordings. The manual covers all six pipeline stages in technical depth: S1 — Software installation and environment: system requirements, virtual environment setup, dependency groups, GPU configuration S2 — Configuration system: two-level YAML architecture, experiment reproducibility via run_config.yaml, global parameter blocks S3 — Stage 1 (Audio I/O): seek-based memory-efficient reading, channel selection, resampling, amplitude normalization S4 — Stage 2 (Segmentation and windowing): timeline discretization, class definitions, exclusion zone logic, binary erosion, scroll augmentation S5 — Stage 3 (Spectrogram generation): STFT parameters, frequency cropping, image output parameters, colormap and channel mode S6 — Stage 4 (Image preprocessing): per-image normalization, OpenCV filter pipeline (CLAHE, Sobel, and others) S7 — Stage 5 (CNN training): architecture plug-in convention, stratified k-fold cross-validation, training hyperparameters, output artefacts S8 — Stage 6 (Cross-domain evaluation): annotation protocol, spectrogram generation for external datasets, evaluation modes, classification threshold S-UTIL.1 — Spectrogram PDF catalog: headless quality-control utility for HPC environments Related resources Source code (Apache 2.0): https://github.com/roccodm/ai-pam-pipeline Software archive: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19860736 How to cite If you use this manual or the ai-pam-pipeline software, please cite the companion software archive: De Marco, R. (2026). ai-pam-pipeline framework, v1.0.0. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19860736 License This documentation is released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). The software itself is released under the Apache License 2.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocco De Marco (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: