Randomized trial compares training load methods for muscular adaptations in older adults, suggesting benefits of velocity-based training.
Hickmott, LM, Bristol, AR, Davidson, CE, Chaudry, A, Ko, J, Butcher, SJ, and Chilibeck, PD. A Comparison of fixed percentage of One-Repetition Maximum, rating of perceived exertion, and last repetition velocity-based training load prescription on muscular adaptations in older adults. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The purpose of this pilot study was to compare fixed (percentage-based training; PBT), subjectively autoregulated (rating of perceived exertion-based training via repetitions in reserve; RBT), and objectively autoregulated (last repetition velocity-based training via individualized last repetition average concentric velocities; LRVBT) resistance training (RT) load prescription on muscular adaptations in older adults (mean age: ∼62 years). A total of 18 males and 18 females were randomized into one of the load prescription groups with matching for baseline strength and administered a 12-week RT intervention. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. There was a significant group × time interaction for four-repetition maximum (4RM) bench press ( p = 0.042). Change in 4RM bench press was greater with LRVBT (12.2 ± 4.9 kg) compared to PBT (6.8 ± 4.5 kg), while change for RBT (8.5 ± 4.4 kg) did not differ from the other groups. There was no significant group × time interaction for 4RM back squat ( p = 0.106); however, all groups significantly increased 4RM back squat from baseline ( p < 0.001; PBT: 17.9 ± 10.6 kg; RBT: 22.3 ± 10.4 kg; LRVBT: 28.5 ± 10.9 kg). Change in knee extensor muscle thickness was significantly greater ( p = 0.020) in LRVBT (0.71 ± 0.43 cm) than RBT (0.21 ± 0.42 cm). All groups similarly improved functional performance (i.e., 5-times chair sit-to-stand, timed up-and-go, 6-meter fast gait speed, and stair-climb power test). LRVBT may be superior for increasing bench press strength, but not back squat strength, power, and functional performance in older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hickmott et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: