Spatial Prioritization of Multi-Species Conservation and Wild Boar Conflict Risk in the Chengdu Section of the Giant Panda National Park

In national park sections adjacent to large cities, protected wildlife habitats often intersect with roads, tourism, agriculture, forestry, and other community-use spaces. This overlap complicates the joint prioritization of multi-species conservation and potential human-wildlife conflict governance. Using species trace-point data from the Fourth National Giant Panda Survey, we developed 30 m MaxEnt distribution models for 12 mammal species in the Chengdu section of the Giant Panda National Park and integrated protected-species’ conservation priority with potential wild-boar-related conflict pressure. Test AUC values ranged from 0.702 to 0.897, and elevation was the dominant predictor for 11 species. The Top 15% weighted conservation priority area, based on protection status and rarity, covered 350.1 km2. Potential wild boar conflict pressure was defined as wild boar suitability multiplied by human exposure, and the Top 15% risk area covered 348.3 km2. Overlaying the two layers identified 61.6 km2 of high-conservation-high-conflict areas. Functional-zone statistics showed that the core conservation zone concentrated higher multi-species conservation value, whereas the general control zone carried stronger potential wild boar conflict pressure. This framework provides a spatial basis for coordinating protected mammal monitoring, crop-damage warning, and community co-management.