Narrative review explores immune-endometrial interactions in heavy menstrual bleeding, highlighting implications for treatment strategies.
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common gynecological disorder increasingly recognized as a complex systemic condition involving dysregulated interactions between the immune system and the endometrium. Beyond traditional uterine-centered explanations, growing evidence highlights the importance of immune-endometrial crosstalk in regulating menstruation, vascular integrity, inflammation, tissue breakdown, and endometrial repair. This narrative review examines the role of monocyte and macrophage dysregulation in the pathophysiology of HMB and explores the broader interorgan dynamics contributing to disease progression. Monocytes and macrophages are central regulators of endometrial remodeling, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix turnover, and hemostasis throughout the menstrual cycle. Dysregulated recruitment, polarization, and activation of these immune cells contribute to excessive inflammatory signaling, impaired vascular stability, delayed tissue repair, and abnormal menstrual blood loss. Key inflammatory mediators implicated include tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, CCL2, vascular endothelial growth factor, prostaglandins, matrix metalloproteinases, and NF-κB-associated pathways. The review further highlights systemic interactions involving the bone marrow, liver, vascular endothelium, endocrine system, and gut-immune axis, emphasizing HMB as a multisystem inflammatory disorder. Emerging evidence suggests that inflammatory biomarkers, immune profiling, and molecular characterization may improve disease stratification and support precision medicine approaches. Understanding HMB through the framework of immune-endometrial crosstalk provides new opportunities for biomarker development, targeted immunomodulatory therapies, and individualized patient management aimed at improving reproductive and overall health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: