Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive analysis evaluates firearm-related injuries in children, highlighting key disparities and risks.
Objective To evaluate and identify commonalities among pediatric firearm-related injuries in the diverse metropolitan and micropolitan population of Upstate South Carolina. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of 104 patients aged 0–17 years who presented to Greenville Memorial Hospital from January 1, 2017 to July 1, 2023 and were diagnosed with a firearm-related injury. Results Patients were predominantly male (77.9%), Black (54.8%), with an average age of 11.9 years. Unintentional injury was the most common intent among all ages and races (44.2%). Unintentional injury was more likely among pre-teens, while assaultive/homicidal injuries were more likely among ages 13–17 ( p = 0.002). Assault/homicide was more likely among Black children, and self-inflicted injuries were more likely among White children ( p = 0.039). Residence was the most common location (46.2%). Of the patients eligible for psychiatric consultation, 21.5% received one. The distress level of the community impacted frequency, though it was not predictive of intent. Conclusions Though disparities based upon sex and race exist, unintentional firearm-related injury is universally problematic in the Upstate South Carolina. Efforts directed at reducing unintentional injuries, improving documentation, and championing psychiatric consults may reduce pediatric firearm-related injuries and sequelae in the Upstate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wymbs et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: