Randomized trial demonstrates automated shape quality control improves efficiency in precast concrete production, suggesting enhanced compliance management.
Precise dimensional conformity of precast concrete members is critical for structural performance and on-site assembly accuracy, yet conventional manual inspection remains labor-intensive and unable to scale with modern production-line throughput. Existing scan-vs-BIM approaches address geometric verification in principle but are constrained by manual registration dependencies, the absence of machine-readable IFC-linked tolerance criteria, and limited validation under real factory yard conditions. This study presents a production-scale automated shape quality control (SQC) framework that closes all three gaps simultaneously. A purpose-designed two-point target device enables fully automated, repeatable registration seed-point extraction. A formal IFC property-set-linked rule engine architecture—comprising entity extraction, deviation computation, rule interpretation, and pass/fail decision stages—replaces ad hoc script-based tolerance checking with an interoperable, auditable compliance pipeline. Factory-scale validation on precast arch segments (n = 10) and wall panels (n = 12) achieved registration RMSE of 1.25–1.95 mm, pass rates exceeding 91%, and a 37.1% reduction in inspection time versus manual methods (95% CI: 34.5–39.6%; p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 3.89). Repeatability testing yielded ICC = 0.971 and Bland–Altman limits of agreement of [−0.45, +1.07] mm. The framework represents a substantive step toward fully digital, production-integrated quality management for industrialized precast construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dongwook Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: