Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposes an embodied–ecological–enactive model to enhance understanding of teacher noticing in classrooms, suggesting practical implications for teaching methods.
This paper addresses limitations of traditional cognitivist models of teacher noticing by proposing an embodied–ecological–enactive model grounded in the pragmatic synthesis of three complementary theoretical perspectives. We examine how teachers engage bodily processes in perception (embodied perspective), perceive affordances in classroom environments (ecological perspective), and enact meaning through dynamic interactions (enactive perspective). Drawing on these perspectives, we conceptualise teacher noticing as embodied ecological enactment—teachers’ professional responsiveness to classroom affordances through action—which manifests through three interrelated analytic dimensions: affordance attunement through embodied exploration, affordance actualisation through enactment, and affordance cultivation through dynamic engagement. Critically, we do not treat embodied, ecological, and enactive accounts as separate processes that interact; rather, we employ them as complementary analytic emphases for describing one core phenomenon of professional responsiveness to classroom environments. Each tradition already incorporates central features that the others foreground; our synthesis draws selectively on the distinct conceptual emphases each provides in order to illuminate complementary dimensions of a unified phenomenon. This synthesis transcends the mind–body and teacher–environment dichotomies that constrain traditional cognitivist frameworks, reconceptualising teacher noticing as an embodied professional practice that emerges within complex classroom ecologies rather than as a decontextualised mental operation. By positioning this model as a research agenda, we open new directions for studying teacher noticing as it unfolds in the lived experience of teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scheiner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: