Demonstrates optimized crystallography in TiO2 thin films, suggesting efficient manufacturing strategies.
In ATomic Layer Deposition (ALD) processes, one-factor-at-a-time tuning remains standard, inflating experimental cost and time, and masking factor interactions. Here, a Taguchi L9 (3 3 ) design is employed to map how cycle number (A: 100/250/400), temperature (B: 170/180/190 °C), and pulse time (C: 10/15/20 ms) influence phase composition and thickness/roughness of ALD-grown titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) on Si. Reflectivity was modeled using Parratt recursion with Nevot-Croce roughness in Advanced Material Analysis and Simulation Software (AMASS), and signal-to-noise ( S / N ) optimization applied the “smaller is better” criterion. Across the matrix, thickness is primarily set by A, rising from 4 to 5 nm at 100 cycles to 16–17 nm at 400 cycles, while the roughness percentage decreases as films thicken (14–20 to 3.7–4.0%); B and C tune the rutile content. Interaction plots revealed B × C coupling for rutile content and roughness, while Factor A showed additive effects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) attributed 99.7 and 97.1% of variance in thickness and roughness to A, and rutile variance mainly to B (41.5%) and C (40.9%). Confirmation experiments validated predictions: A 1 B 3 C 2 minimized rutile (26.2 vs 25.1% predicted), A 1 B 1 C 1 minimized thickness (4.20 nm), and A 3 B 1 C 2 yielded the lowest roughness (3.63%). These results deliver statistically supported process windows for ultrathin, low-roughness, anatase-rich TiO 2 and outline a minimal-experiment strategy transferable to other ALD systems for controlling crystallography and film characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gergeroglu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: