Why the study?
The feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating non-operative treatment compared with appendicectomy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis needed to be established.
Is a randomized controlled trial comparing a non-operative treatment pathway to appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible?
Is a randomized controlled trial comparing a non-operative treatment pathway to appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible?
A randomized controlled trial comparing non-operative treatment to appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children is feasible, with a 50% recruitment rate.
This feasibility study leaves open viability of a definitive trial on antibiotics or drainage; supports testing enhanced recruiter training.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study to inform recruiter training to optimise recruitment and the design of a future definitive trial. SETTING: Three specialist paediatric surgery centres in the UK. PATIENTS: Children (aged 4-15 years) with a clinical diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS: Appendicectomy or a non-operative treatment pathway (comprising broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited. Secondary outcomes evaluated adherence to interventions, data collection during follow-up, safety of treatment pathways and clinical course. RESULTS: Fifty per cent of eligible participants (95% CI 40 to 59) approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. Repeated bespoke recruiter training was associated with an increase in recruitment rate over the course of the trial from 38% to 72%. There was high acceptance of randomisation, good patient and surgeon adherence to trial procedures and satisfactory completion of follow-up. Although more participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated, treatment pathways were found to be safe and adverse event profiles acceptable. CONCLUSION: Recruitment to a randomised controlled trial examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15830435.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: