Key result
Acoramidis achieves ~49% greater transthyretin stabilization than placebo plus tafamidis at 30 months.
Why the study?
Differences in the stabilizing effect and magnitude of serum transthyretin increases between acoramidis and tafamidis in ATTR-CM patients were not well characterized.
Does acoramidis improve transthyretin stabilization compared to tafamidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy?
RCT (n=268)
Does acoramidis improve transthyretin stabilization compared to tafamidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acoramidis demonstrated greater transthyretin stabilization compared to tafamidis in both in vivo and in vitro analyses of patients with ATTR-CM.
BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, often fatal disease caused by transthyretin (TTR) tetramer destabilization, leading to amyloid deposition from either age-related wild type TTR or pathogenic TTR variants. TTR variants are less stable than wild type TTR, leading to lower serum TTR (sTTR) and worse clinical outcomes. TTR stabilizers, tafamidis and acoramidis, are approved for treatment of patients with ATTR-CM. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in stabilizing effect and magnitude of sTTR increases for acoramidis and tafamidis using data from the ATTRibute-CM (Efficacy and Safety of AG10 in Subjects With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy) trial. METHODS: Stabilizing potency was analyzed using sTTR as an in vivo readout and by applying 2 orthogonal pharmacodynamic assays: Western blot and fluorescent probe exclusion. In vitro analyses used blood samples from patients with variant ATTR-CM at clinically relevant concentrations of acoramidis (10 μM) and tafamidis (16-26 μM). RESULTS: In ATTRibute-CM, treatment with acoramidis (n = 234) resulted in a greater rise in sTTR from baseline to month 30 vs placebo plus tafamidis (n = 34). Acoramidis achieved greater TTR stabilization than placebo plus tafamidis at month 30 by Western blot (90.2% [n = 83] vs 60.6% [n = 6]) and fluorescent probe exclusion (99.7% [n = 71] vs 68.0% [n = 4]), although this was limited by a small sample size. Subsequent in vitro analysis corroborated acoramidis was a more effective TTR stabilizer than tafamidis across all 51 individual participant samples tested, representing 17 unique variants. CONCLUSIONS: Acoramidis is a near-complete stabilizer of wild type and variant TTR. Although in vitro comparisons between acoramidis and tafamidis suggest greater stabilization by acoramidis, randomized prospective trial data comparing these TTR stabilizers are lacking, and further investigation is warranted. (Efficacy and Safety of AG10 in Subjects With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy [ATTRibute-CM]; NCT03860935).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judge et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=268). Acoramidis vs. Placebo plus tafamidis was evaluated on Transthyretin stabilization at month 30 by Western blot. Acoramidis achieved greater transthyretin stabilization than placebo plus tafamidis at 30 months by Western blot (90.2% vs 60.6%) and fluorescent probe exclusion (99.7% vs 68.0%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: