Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose – This paper proposes a New Literacies approach to get insight into young people’s capability to detect Fake News. Design/methodology/approach – Replication of a US empirical study in the Netherlands to examine whether schoolchildren were able to identify the spoof website Save The Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus as a fake. Findings – In the Netherlands, only 2 out of 27 school children (7%) recognized the website as being a hoax; results that are worse, even, than those of the 2007 US study, where the website was recognized as being unreliable by slightly more than 6 out of 53 school children (11%). Research limitations/implications – A similar but large scale quantitative empirical study should be conducted in several countries to see if the trends in the US and the Netherlands are indeed significant. Practical implications – It is important to start teaching children at an early age how to critically evaluate online information. Social implications – Our perceived reliability of digital information is a hot issue, given the frequency with which fake news is circulated. Being able to critically evaluate digital information will help us to have access to trustworthy information. Originality/value – Instead of using technological fact checking by Google, Facebook and Twitter, this paper suggests the adoption of a New Literacies approach, focusing on young people’s capability to detect Fake News.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loos et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: