Key result
24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics was reproducible within a short time period in untreated Chinese patients, with ICCs ranging from 0.70 to 0.94.
Why the study?
Non-invasive simultaneous 24-h brachial and central hemodynamic monitoring reproducibility data was limited to White patients, leaving its reproducibility in Chinese patients unknown.
Is 24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics reproducible in untreated Chinese patients suspected of hypertension?
Observational (n=152)
Is 24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics reproducible in untreated Chinese patients suspected of hypertension?
24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics shows good short-term reproducibility in untreated Chinese patients, supporting its use in clinical and research settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support use of 24-h ambulatory hemodynamics monitoring in untreated Chinese patients; extends reproducibility data but leaves broader validation open.
Objective: Advanced technology allows non-invasive monitoring of the 24-h brachial and central hemodynamics simultaneously. However, related reproducibility data was limited in White patients. We therefore explored if the novel measurements would be reproducible in Chinese.Methods: From February 2017 to January 2018, 152 untreated patients who were suspected of hypertension and referred for ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring were recruited. Ambulatory BP monitoring was repeated within one month (median, 12.5 days) using the Mobil-O-Graph monitors (IEM, Germany). Reproducibility was assessed as the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and repeatability coefficient (RC).Results: The 152 participants (average age, 58.6 years) included 54 men and 98 women. The first and second means of the ambulatory brachial and central BPs, pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation pressure, augmentation index (AIx) and AIx at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75) were all similar (p ≥ 0.065), except that the repeated daytime and 24-h brachial and central systolic BPs and pulse pressure slightly differed by approximately 1-2 mmHg (p ≤ 0.011). ICC ranged from 0.70 to 0.94 for all ambulatory BPs and ≥0.91 for the arterial measurements. CV was in the range from 5.0% to 10.3% for all BPs and PWV measurements, and from 15.5% to 22.3% for AIx and AIx@75. RC expressed as percentages of maximal variation was <15% for the PWVs and ranged from 25.5% to 54.7% for BPs, AIx and AIx@75.Conclusions: The 24-h ambulatory brachial and central BPs and arterial measurements were reproducible within a short time period in Chinese, and could therefore be used in clinical practice and research settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Suspected hypertension (n=152). 24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics was evaluated on Reproducibility assessed as intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for ambulatory BPs (ICC 0.70 to 0.94). 24-h ambulatory monitoring of brachial and central hemodynamics was reproducible within a short time period in untreated Chinese patients, with ICCs ranging from 0.70 to 0.94.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: