Key result
Metabolic syndrome was independently associated with 30-day outcomes and major cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events over a 2-year follow-up in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Does the metabolic syndrome impact left ventricular geometry and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=182)
Does the metabolic syndrome impact left ventricular geometry and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Metabolic syndrome and left ventricular hypertrophy are independent predictors of adverse short- and mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metabolic syndrome may identify higher-risk AVR patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before guiding practice.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the metabolic syndrome on the left ventricular geometry as well as on the early and mid-time outcome in patients with aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement. METHODOLOGY: The study included 182 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis. The metabolic syndrome was defined by the presence of at least three AHA-NHLB (American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute) criteria. All the patients were followed for at least 2 years after the surgery. RESULTS: The metabolic syndrome did not influence the severity of aortic stenosis (mean gradient and aortic valve area). However, the metabolic syndrome was associated with the reduced prevalence of the normal left ventricular geometry and the increased risk of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis. Among the metabolic syndrome criteria, only increased blood pressure was simultaneously associated with the short-term and mid-term outcome, independently of other risk factors. Increased fasting glucose level was an independent predictor of the only 30-day outcome after the valve replacement. The metabolic syndrome and left ventricular hypertrophy were, independently of hypertension and diabetes, associated with the 30-day outcome, as well as incidence of major cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in the 2-year postoperative period. CONCLUSION: The metabolic syndrome does not change severity of the aortic stenosis, but significantly impacts the left ventricular remodeling in these patients. The metabolic syndrome and left ventricular hypertrophy, irrespective of hypertension and diabetes, are predictors of the short-term and mid-term outcome of patients with aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tadić et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=182). Metabolic syndrome vs. Absence of metabolic syndrome was evaluated on 30-day outcome and 2-year incidence of major cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Metabolic syndrome was independently associated with 30-day outcomes and major cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events over a 2-year follow-up in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: