Key result
SMA-tDodSNO combined with Dox or SMA-Dox significantly increased anticancer efficacy compared to control (P<0.001) without causing significant toxicity in a TNBC model.
Why the study?
Does SMA-tDodSNO improve the anticancer activity of doxorubicin in a model of triple-negative breast cancer?
Does SMA-tDodSNO improve the anticancer activity of doxorubicin in a model of triple-negative breast cancer?
p-value: p=<0.001
Nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles (SMA-tDodSNO) enhance the anticancer efficacy of doxorubicin in triple-negative breast cancer models without significant added toxicity.
May enhance doxorubicin efficacy in TNBC models without added toxicity; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: -dodecane S-nitrosothiol [tDodSNO]) with the aim of enhancing the anticancer properties of doxorubicin (Dox) and a Dox-loaded nanoparticle (SMA-Dox) carrier. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of SMA-tDodSNO and/or in combination with Dox or SMA-Dox on cell viability, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential, lysosomal membrane permeability, tumor tissue, and tumor growth were studied using in vitro and in vivo model of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In addition, the concentrations of SMA-Dox and Dox in combination with SMA-tDodSNO were measured in cells and tumor tissues. RESULTS: <0.001 vs control), without causing significant toxicity as monitored through body weight loss. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results suggest that SMA-tDodSNO can be used as a successful strategy to increase the efficacy of Dox and SMA-Dox in a model of TNBC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alimoradi et al. (2018) studied Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). SMA-tDodSNO in combination with Dox or SMA-Dox vs. Control was evaluated on Anticancer activity and tumor growth (p=<0.001). SMA-tDodSNO combined with Dox or SMA-Dox significantly increased anticancer efficacy compared to control (P<0.001) without causing significant toxicity in a TNBC model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: