Key result
In patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVR resulted in a significantly higher completion rate of subsequent non-cardiac surgery (75% vs 33%, p=0.010) and a shorter interval between operations compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to clarify the influence of introducing TAVR on patients with AS undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Does the introduction of TAVR improve the completion rate of non-cardiac surgery and shorten the interval between operations in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=34)
No
Does the introduction of TAVR improve the completion rate of non-cardiac surgery and shorten the interval between operations in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 33%
p-value: p=0.010
The introduction of TAVR for patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing non-cardiac surgery allowed older, higher-risk patients to undergo necessary procedures with a shorter interval between operations.
TAVR may facilitate non-cardiac surgery completion in severe AS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)on patients with aortic stenosis(AS) undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Methods: Thirty-four patients with severe AS diagnosed by preoperative evaluation for non-cardiac surgery were reviewed and compared in following two categories. First,patient’s profile and surgical risk were compared between pre-TAVR group (n=10) and post-TAVR group (n=24)according to before or after the introduction of TAVR. Second, completion rate of non-cardiac surgery and interval between two operation were compared between surgical aortic valve replacement(AVR)patients before introduction of TAVR (pre-AVR group (n=10)), AVR patientsafter introduction of TAVR (post-AVR (n=12)), and TAVR patients (TAVR group (n=12)). Results: Ageand Japan score were higherin post-TAVR group than in pre-TAVR group. Malignancy was the most common non-cardiac disease (80%) in pre-TAVR group, however, orthopedic disease became the most common (50%) in post-TAVR group. Completion rate of non-cardiac operation in pre-AVR, post-AVR and TAVR group were 70%, 33%, and 75% (post-AVR vs. TAVR: p=0.010), and interval between two operations were 129±98 days, 87±40 days and 27±15 days, respectively (pre AVR vs. TAVR: p=0.034 and post AVR vs. TAVR: p=0.025).In Post-TAVR group, AVR was selected because of unfit condition for TAVR in 5 out of 12 patients. Conclusions: After introduction of TAVR, more senile and high-risk patients became the candidate for two staged operation and orthopedics became the most common non-cardiac disease. Innovation of transcatheter valvular interventionsand expansion of indication for currently evaluated as “unfit for TAVR” might be crucial issue for non-cardiac surgery with severe AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omoto et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis requiring non-cardiac surgery (n=34). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (post-AVR group) was evaluated on Completion rate of non-cardiac surgery (p=0.010). In patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVR resulted in a significantly higher completion rate of subsequent non-cardiac surgery (75% vs 33%, p=0.010) and a shorter interval between operations compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: