Key result
Elective percutaneous coronary intervention at a teaching hospital incurred a significantly higher mean total hospitalization cost (RM 16,289) compared to a general hospital (RM 12,117), driven by worse patient comorbidities and longer length of stay.
Why the study?
Does elective PCI at a teaching hospital compared to a general hospital result in different hospitalization costs and length of stay in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=615)
Yes
Does elective PCI at a teaching hospital compared to a general hospital result in different hospitalization costs and length of stay in patients with coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 16289.17% vs 12117.45%
p-value: p=<0.001
Elective PCI at a teaching hospital incurs higher hospitalization costs and longer length of stay compared to a general hospital, largely driven by worse patient comorbidities and fewer same-day discharges.
Elective PCI costs more at teaching hospitals; leaves open whether case mix or processes drive differences beyond this single-center cohort.
INTRODUCTION: The increasing disease burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) calls for sustainable cardiac service. Teaching hospitals and general hospitals in Malaysia are main providers of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a common treatment for CAD. Few studies have analyzed the contemporary data on local cardiac facilities. Service expansion and budget allocation require cost evidence from various providers. We aim to compare the patient characteristics, procedural outcomes, and cost profile between a teaching hospital (TH) and a general hospital (GH). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from the healthcare providers' perspective from January 1st to June 30th 2014. TH is a university teaching hospital in the capital city, while GH is a state-level general hospital. Both are government-funded cardiac referral centers. Clinical data was extracted from a national cardiac registry. Cost data was collected using mixed method of top-down and bottom-up approaches. Total hospitalization cost per PCI patient was summed up from the costs of ward admission and cardiac catheterization laboratory utilization. Clinical characteristics were compared with chi-square and independent t-test, while hospitalization length and cost were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The mean hospitalization cost was RM 12,117 (USD 3,366) at GH and RM 16,289 (USD 4,525) at TH. The higher cost at TH can be attributed to worse patients' comorbidities and cardiac status. In contrast, GH recorded a lower mean length of stay as more patients had same-day discharge, resulting in 29% reduction in mean cost of admission compared to TH. For both hospitals, PCI consumables accounted for the biggest proportion of total cost. CONCLUSIONS: The high PCI consumables cost highlighted the importance of cost-effective purchasing mechanism. Findings on the heterogeneity of the patients, treatment practice and hospitalization cost between TH and GH are vital for formulation of cost-saving strategies to ensure sustainable and equitable cardiac service in Malaysia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=615). Admission to a teaching hospital vs. Admission to a general hospital was evaluated on Total hospitalization cost (RM) (p=<0.001). Elective percutaneous coronary intervention at a teaching hospital incurred a significantly higher mean total hospitalization cost (RM 16,289) compared to a general hospital (RM 12,117), driven by worse patient comorbidities and longer length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: