Key result
The Chinese version of the Short-form Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales demonstrated high internal consistency (0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.98) in older patients with chronic diseases.
Why the study?
Is the Chinese version of the Short-form Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales reliable and valid for older adults with chronic diseases?
Population
163 older patients with chronic diseases
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support self-efficacy assessment in older Chinese chronic disease patients; extends validation evidence but leaves open prospective outcome studies.
Cross-Sectional (n=163)
Is the Chinese version of the Short-form Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales reliable and valid for older adults with chronic diseases?
The Chinese version of the Short-form CDSES is a reliable and valid tool for assessing self-efficacy in older patients with chronic diseases.
Chow et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic diseases (n=163). Chinese version of the Short-form Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales was evaluated on Reliability and validity (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity). The Chinese version of the Short-form Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales demonstrated high internal consistency (0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.98) in older patients with chronic diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: