Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates fibrosis screening indicators, reducing the population needing screening while increasing detection rates.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current guideline-defined indicators for fibrosis screening identify a large proportion of the general population, burdening healthcare resources. We aimed to evaluate and refine indicators for fibrosis screening. METHODS: without excessive alcohol use. We obtained the weighted-proportions of individuals across stratified screening indicators and targeted only subgroups with ≥10% LSM ≥8kPa risk for screening. These refined criteria were validated and linked with liver-related events in four general-population cohorts. RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 5,904 adults (8.9% LSM ≥8kPa). Current guidelines identified 60-76% as screening-eligible, yielding an LSM ≥8kPa prevalence of 11-14% among those screening-eligible and 2% among those not eligible. Our refined strategy targeted 22% for screening, increasing prevalence to 28% among those screening-eligible while maintaining low prevalence (4%) in those not eligible. In the pooled validation cohort (n = 13,295; 7.0% LSM ≥8 kPa), 14% met the refined criteria. Results remained consistent across thresholds: LSM ≥8, ≥10, and ≥12 kPa prevalence among screening-eligible individuals was 22%, 13%, and 8%, respectively, and 4%, 2%, and 1% among those not eligible. In UK-Biobank (n=282,852), individuals meeting the refined criteria had ∼6-fold higher 10-year risks of incident cirrhosis (0.99% vs 0.18%) and liver-related death (0.40% vs 0.07%). CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations target 60-76% of adults for fibrosis screening. Our refined strategy reduced this to 10-22%, achieving significantly higher disease prevalence among those eligible for screening while maintaining a very low risk of increased LSM or liver-related events in those not eligible for screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleef et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: