Demonstrates enhanced identification of oxygenated organic molecules in the atmosphere, suggesting improvements in accuracy and resolution.
Atmospheric oxygenated organic molecules (OOMs) are key intermediates driving secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and new particle growth, yet their molecular-level characterization is constrained by the insufficient mass resolution of current online mass spectrometers (MS). Here, we developed a high-resolution nitrate chemical-ionization Orbitrap MS (NO 3 – -Orbitrap) and conducted parallel field and laboratory intercomparison with a widely used nitrate chemical-ionization time-of-flight MS (NO 3 – -TOF). The results show that the NO 3 – -Orbitrap unambiguously separates multiple neighboring high- m / z OOMs with peak distances smaller than 0.01 Da. During field observations, the NO 3 – -Orbitrap detected 1363 OOM peaks, of which 404 overlapped with those identified by the NO 3 – -TOF, which detected 930 OOM peaks, indicating that a large proportion of TOF-assigned peaks were misidentified. Leveraging the Orbitrap-derived peak list, we introduce a new framework for refitting NO 3 – -TOF spectra (NO 3 – -TOF_Modified), which substantially reduces peak misidentification and increases the number of OOMs with strong cross-instrument agreement ( r ≥ 0.7) from 45 to 221 OOMs. Specifically, the average OOM concentration measured by NO 3 – -TOF_Modified was 1.9 times that measured by NO 3 – -Orbitrap. Severe interference from adjacent peaks due to the low mass resolution of the NO 3 – -TOF_Modified, together with the lower sensitivity of the NO 3 – -Orbitrap, largely explains the weak correlations in the time series of the remaining OOMs and the concentration differences among instruments. Our study highlights the essential role of ultrahigh-resolution MS for resolving atmospheric OOM complexity and provides a new framework for enhancing both current and historical OOM identifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: