Retrospective paired-control study evaluates softband simulation accuracy in predicting hearing outcomes after BCD implantation, suggesting better focus on speech testing.
Background: Bone conduction devices (BCDs) are used to rehabilitate conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, and single-sided deafness. Preoperative softband simulation is commonly used to estimate expected postoperative benefit; however, its predictive accuracy is uncertain. Purpose: To determine how accurately preoperative softband simulation predicts postoperative audiological outcomes after BCD implantation. Research Design: This retrospective paired-control study compared preoperative softband performance with postoperative implanted BCD outcomes. Study Sample: This study included 19 patients with conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, or single-sided deafness who underwent both preoperative softband simulation and postoperative audiological testing at a tertiary academic medical center. Intervention: Patients completed preoperative testing using softband-mounted sound processors and postoperative testing using their implanted BCD device. Data Collection and Analysis: Pure-tone average (PTA), consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition, and Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) scores were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated group differences. Predictive accuracy was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Softband PTA significantly overestimated postoperative thresholds (mean difference = 5.8 dB HL; p = 0.023), and softband PTA was not significantly correlated with postoperative PTA (ρ = 0.43; p = 0.069). Agreement was poor (ICC = 0.28). Postoperative CNC word recognition scores were significantly higher than preoperative softband scores (mean difference = 7.5 percent; p = 0.034), and a strong correlation was observed between preoperative and postoperative performance (ρ = 0.67; p = 0.003). QuickSIN scores did not differ significantly and did not demonstrate a correlation. Conclusions: Softband simulation underestimates average postoperative improvement in hearing thresholds and speech discrimination after BCD implantation. Among individual predictors, preoperative simulated CNC scores approximate postoperative performance more closely than pure-tone thresholds, whereas PTA predictions show poor agreement. Clinical Relevance Statement: Softband simulation is widely used in counseling, but its predictive accuracy varies. These findings suggest that clinicians should place greater emphasis on speech-based testing rather than pure-tone thresholds when using softband results to guide patient expectations and preoperative decision-making. An improved understanding of softband limitations may enhance counseling and support to enable more accurate preparation for BCD outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: