Demonstrates reduced tracking errors in multi-UAV formations, indicating improved performance in turbulent conditions.
Multi-UAV formation control in low-altitude urban environments faces critical challenges from atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) disturbances, including turbulence, wind gusts, and communication inefficiency in resource-constrained swarms. This paper proposes an adaptive dynamic event-triggered formation control (ADETFC) strategy integrated with a finite-time disturbance observer (FTDO) for multi-agent hexarotor UAV formations operating under ABL conditions. The novelty of the proposed ADETFC lies in employing dual adaptive parameters to simultaneously account for tracking error magnitude and inter-agent formation geometry, dynamically adjusting communication frequency. A nonsingular terminal sliding mode manifold ensures rapid transient convergence and robustness against nonlinearities and inter-agent coupling. The FTDO estimates lumped disturbances with finite-time convergence to a bounded residual neighborhood, enabling reduced control gains that mitigate chattering and actuator wear. Lyapunov-based analysis establishes finite-time reachability of the sliding manifold and guarantees that the tracking error converges to a bounded residual set in finite time. The Zeno-free operation is guaranteed by a strictly positive minimum inter-event time analytically derived from system dynamics. Simulations under three ABL scenarios, including Dryden turbulence, wind gusts, and sinusoidal disturbances, demonstrate formation tracking RMSE reductions of up to 29.4%, disturbance estimation RMSE reductions of up to 54.3%, and communication-event reductions of 46.4–63.2% compared with benchmark schemes. These results confirm accurate formation tracking, efficient communication, and robust multi-agent networking under challenging wind conditions, making the framework suitable for networked UAV applications in complex environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilyas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: