Comprehensive review identifies compatibility issues in biomass energy integration for data centers, suggesting new frameworks.
The global transition toward renewable energy has intensified interest in dispatchable low-carbon sources that can support reliability-critical infrastructure in smart grid systems. Data centers represent one of the fastest-growing electricity loads globally, yet their compatibility with biomass-based energy systems as a dispatchable renewable source within smart grid architectures remains poorly understood. This study presented a comprehensive review of biomass power generation, data center energy management, and smart grid integration, drawing on a corpus of 347 peer-reviewed sources. A staged analytical design separated demand characterization from supply evaluation, ensuring that data center energy requirements emerged independently of supply-side assumptions. Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling validated with BERTopic and VOSviewer network analysis, the study identified four distinct thematic clusters and found no single topic spanning data center reliability requirements, biomass supply dynamics, and smart grid integration simultaneously, a pattern that points to an underexplored cross-domain space in the literature. A demand–supply–grid alignment framework was introduced to illustrate compatibility conditions across temporal resolution, reliability requirements, and grid management dimensions. The alignment framework and illustrative simulation developed here are offered as analytical starting points to guide future engineering and empirical investigation rather than as demonstrations of operational readiness. An illustrative application demonstrated that biomass feedstock logistics constraints create persistent availability gaps at data center operational timescales, suggesting that supply chain resilience and grid-mediated buffering are likely necessary conditions for viable integration, a proposition that warrants empirical validation through full-scale engineering studies. The findings indicate that integration constraints reflect temporal and operational misalignment rather than technological infeasibility, providing a new analytical perspective for evaluating renewable energy integration in reliability-critical digital
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Penneigh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: