Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines soybean yield variability during adverse climatic years in Eastern Croatia, indicating significant climate impact.
Recent hydrothermal extremes threaten soybean productivity in rainfed systems of Southeastern Europe, but single-location field datasets require cautious interpretation. This study evaluated cultivar-level soybean yield variability in large-scale rainfed field trials near Osijek, eastern Croatia, during 2020–2025 and compared the climatic context of the adverse 2024 and 2025 seasons. Grain yield, adjusted to 13% moisture, was analyzed across years and maturity groups (MGs) using ANOVA, Fisher’s LSD mean separation, ANCOVA/linear trend analysis, and exploratory climate–yield correlations. Daily station data for 2024–2025 were used to calculate extreme-temperature indices. ANOVA showed a highly significant year effect on yield (p < 0.001), whereas MG and Year × MG were not significant. Fisher’s LSD separated 2023 and 2021 as the highest-yielding years, 2024 as intermediate, and 2022 and 2025 as the lowest-yield group. ANCOVA indicated a significant negative common temporal trend (−0.155 t ha−1 year−1; p < 0.001). Yield was positively associated with June–August precipitation (Pearson r = 0.885; n = 6). The 2024 season showed a stronger heat-related signal, whereas 2025 showed a stronger precipitation-deficit signal. The results should be interpreted within the limits of a site-specific, unbalanced field-trial dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duvnjak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: