Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present work introduces a new analytical category for describing monetary exchange — the negative contract — and proposes viewing any monetary transaction as a bilateral contract with a persisting system state after its completion. In standard economic interpretation, a transaction is considered complete at the moment of settlement: Seller A receives monetary funds, Buyer B receives goods or services, the exchange is closed. The present work proposes an alternative description: in addition to the transfer of monetary funds and goods, a transaction generates a directed link between A and B that persists over time and is not captured by existing analytical instruments. This link is characterized by a vector indicating the direction of monetary flow and a scalar equal to the transaction amount. The aggregate of such links accumulated in an economic system forms a structure of negative contracts — an observable magnitude reflecting the directed redistribution of monetary funds between economic agents. Unlike aggregate inequality indicators, this structure cannot be collapsed into a single number without loss of information: the direction of flow, rather than volume alone, carries independent analytical content. The work describes the properties of the negative contract, establishes its non-transferability and distinction from debt obligations, examines the temporal and multi-circuit nature of the indicator, and illustrates its analytical potential across concrete economic situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evgeny Pustovoy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: