Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hybrid model forecasts dynamic structural responses under seismic excitations, enhancing real-time monitoring.
In this study, a hybrid physics-based and data-driven model is proposed to reliably forecast the dynamic responses of structures under time-varying excitations. While detailed physics-based models are accurate, they are computationally intensive; conversely, purely data-driven models are efficient but highly dependent on data quality and volume. The proposed hybrid approach bridges this gap by combining a fast, low-fidelity physics-based model with a data-driven corrector to predict the residuals between the low-fidelity approximation and the high-fidelity target. Specifically, the low-fidelity physical model relies on a multi-degree-of-freedom mass-spring-damper system, while the data-driven corrector is based on a selective state-space neural network. The viability of the proposed model is demonstrated using a multi-story structural case study featuring nonlinear behavior. The model achieves high predictive accuracy, with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 4.76% across the test set. Furthermore, it significantly reduces computational time compared to purely physics-based models and requires less training data than purely data-driven approaches. By enabling rapid and reliable predictions of structural behavior under extreme dynamic loading, this framework provides an efficient tool for near-real-time structural health monitoring and post-event vulnerability assessment, directly contributing to the safety and resilience of the built environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: