Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates microperimetry outcomes in patients following gene therapy, suggesting improved visual function monitoring.
INTRODUCTION: Gene therapy with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl was approved primarily based on improvements observed in the Multi-Luminance Mobility Test (MLMT), while the full-field stimulus threshold (FST) test, a secondary endpoint, also demonstrated efficacy. However, the MLMT is difficult to apply in routine practice, and the FST does not provide spatial information regarding retinal function, which limits direct structural-function correlation. PURPOSE: Therefore, this study investigated whether microperimetry could serve as a simpler, more practical alternative by evaluating its changes after this gene therapy. METHODS: Mean sensitivity and fixation parameters were evaluated in a cohort of 5 patients (10 eyes) who underwent microperi-metry following gene therapy in São Paulo, Brazil. Results from individual eyes showed consistent improvements in retinal sensitivity and fixation stability. These findings were consistent with improvements in daily functioning-particularly in low-light conditions-reported by the patients during medical history assessment during the routine visits. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings suggest that microperimetry could be an useful tool for monitoring functional outcomes after gene therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Texeira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: