Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technical note demonstrates a computational method to compare memory dynamics in systems, suggesting valuable insights into path-dependent behavior.
This technical note presents the fourth study in the computational sequence associated with Selector-Time Theory (STT). After the construction of minimal irreversibility-memory kernels, parametric sweeps, robustness tests, and cross-drive prediction, the present work introduces Listing 08, a computational script designed to build a methodological bridge between memory regimes observed in STT-inspired toy models and operational metrics associated with memory systems, hysteresis, path dependence, loss of invertibility, and lock-like behavior. The purpose of the study is not to physically validate STT, nor to claim equivalence between the STT-inspired computational kernel and established physical models of hysteresis such as Preisach or Jiles-Atherton. The proposal is more restricted and methodologically cautious: to define reproducible computational metrics through which operational signatures of the toy model can be compared, at a structural level, with typical features of path-dependent systems. The main execution tested six drive profiles, four noise levels, fifty-one memory-weight values, eight repetitions per configuration, and 420 steps per simulation, totaling 9,792 executions. The results show growth of residual memory, formation of hysteresis-like loops, increasing path asymmetry, drive-dependent variation of invertibility loss, and growth of a lock-like indicator at high memory. The observed global maximum, memory_weight = 0.4900, is interpreted as the peak of the composite hysteresis-bridge metric, not as a replacement for the residual critical zone refined in previous studies. The classification of computational regimes is presented as heuristic and exploratory, not as a physical phase diagram. This record includes the article PDF and a supplementary package containing the Python script, generated CSV files, metadata, execution log, figures, READMEs, and requirements file.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izairton Oliveira de Vasconcelos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: