Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measures cross sections in cerium isotopes, indicating neutron-capture overestimations are unlikely.
The neutron-capture reaction 140 Ce(n, γ ) is a key input for s -process nucleosynthesis due to its low capture probability, and has been discussed as a possible origin of the discrepancy between predicted and observed stellar cerium abundances. This discrepancy motivated a recent activation measurement at kT ≈ 34 keV and a time-of-flight (TOF) measurement, which reported conflicting Maxwellian-averaged cross sections (MACS), leading to large differences at the astrophysically relevant temperature of kT ≈ 8 keV. In this work, the 140 Ce(n, γ ) and 142 Ce(n, γ ) cross sections were measured using an activation technique with a quasi-Maxwellian neutron source at kT ≈ 11 keV, produced via the 18 O(p,n) reaction. A nat Ce sample was irradiated at the PTB Ion Accelerator Facility, and the induced activities were measured by an ultra-low-background HPGe detector at the Felsenkeller underground laboratory. Cross sections were determined relative to the 197 Au(n, γ ) standard and used to derive MACS values. The resulting MACS of 22.2(1.2) mb at k T = 10 keV is higher than the value previously adopted in stellar models, indicating that the observed 140 Ce abundance discrepancy is unlikely to originate from an overestimated neutron-capture cross section. The present result also provides a direct test of the widely used MACS extrapolation procedure from ∼ 30 keV to ∼ 8 keV and offers a unique insight into its reliability and potential limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: