Retrospective study evaluates treatment responses in hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting effective predictive biomarkers for treatment strategies.
To evaluate treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following Yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization by integrating pre-treatment contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) radiomics with post-treatment 90 Y positron emission tomography (PET) dosimetry. This retrospective study included 57 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC. All patients underwent CE-MRI within 4–6 weeks before 90 Y transarterial radioembolization (TARE), followed by 90 Y PET/CT within 24 h post-treatment. Tumor response was assessed at three months using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Radiomic features extracted from CE-MRI and 24 h tumor absorbed dose parameters from 90 Y PET/CT were analyzed to predict treatment response, classifying patients as responders or non-responders. Based on mRECIST criteria, 32 patients were classified as responders (all partial response), while 25 were non-responders (20 stable disease, 5 progressive disease). 24-hour average absorbed dose is independent predictive factors for treatment response (OR = 1.06, p = 0.006). The combined model, incorporating clinical characteristics and MRI-derived radiomic features, achieved a sensitivity of 88% (28/32) [95% CI, 71%–96%], specificity of 68% (17/25) [95% CI, 46%–85%], and accuracy of 79% (45/57) [95% CI, 66%–89%]. The integration of pre-treatment CE-MRI radiomics with post-treatment 90 Y PET imaging provides complementary insights into tumor biology and therapeutic efficacy. Early tumor absorbed dose metrics derived from 90 Y PET, together with specific CE-MRI radiomic features, show strong correlations with treatment response and may serve as valuable predictive biomarkers to guide patient stratification and optimize radioembolization strategies in HCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: